<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#039;s Still Playing with the PageRank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stuffbysarah.net/2007/11/16/googles-still-playing-with-the-pagerank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stuffbysarah.net/2007/11/16/googles-still-playing-with-the-pagerank/</link>
	<description>PHP, WordPress and Business Ramblings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:44:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.stuffbysarah.net/2007/11/16/googles-still-playing-with-the-pagerank/#comment-15651</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuffbysarah.net/2007/11/16/googles-still-playing-with-the-pagerank/#comment-15651</guid>
		<description>Slee you&#039;re right. I even have clients that know their PR and get concerned over it, believing it&#039;s a mark of how good their site is or how busy it is.nnSapphire I agree entirely. Why make it public, what is the real point besides Google wanting everyone to talk about them. It seems that their zeroranking isn&#039;t affecting any search engine results which just goes to show that public PR is not to be trusted nor is it a mark of anything relevant!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slee you&#039;re right. I even have clients that know their PR and get concerned over it, believing it&#039;s a mark of how good their site is or how busy it is.nnSapphire I agree entirely. Why make it public, what is the real point besides Google wanting everyone to talk about them. It seems that their zeroranking isn&#039;t affecting any search engine results which just goes to show that public PR is not to be trusted nor is it a mark of anything relevant!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sapphire</title>
		<link>http://www.stuffbysarah.net/2007/11/16/googles-still-playing-with-the-pagerank/#comment-15650</link>
		<dc:creator>Sapphire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 21:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuffbysarah.net/2007/11/16/googles-still-playing-with-the-pagerank/#comment-15650</guid>
		<description>This is why I&#039;ve been saying Google should stop making PR publicly available, if they don&#039;t want people to attempt to &quot;buy&quot; PR. I can&#039;t figure out why they don&#039;t just keep it to themselves.nnTwo of my sites zeroed out last night, but they still come up just fine when I search for their keywords in Google.nnI have a feeling this is just a dance. I noticed when using a Future Pagerank tool, I got zeroes on EVERY domain, even the ones that show PR in the toolbar. So it&#039;s probably just sort of a glitch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why I&#039;ve been saying Google should stop making PR publicly available, if they don&#039;t want people to attempt to &#034;buy&#034; PR. I can&#039;t figure out why they don&#039;t just keep it to themselves.nnTwo of my sites zeroed out last night, but they still come up just fine when I search for their keywords in Google.nnI have a feeling this is just a dance. I noticed when using a Future Pagerank tool, I got zeroes on EVERY domain, even the ones that show PR in the toolbar. So it&#039;s probably just sort of a glitch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slee</title>
		<link>http://www.stuffbysarah.net/2007/11/16/googles-still-playing-with-the-pagerank/#comment-15649</link>
		<dc:creator>Slee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 20:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuffbysarah.net/2007/11/16/googles-still-playing-with-the-pagerank/#comment-15649</guid>
		<description>The problem though is that even though we as internet savvy people say ignore it eveyone else always asks about it. and they all download the toolbar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem though is that even though we as internet savvy people say ignore it eveyone else always asks about it. and they all download the toolbar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.stuffbysarah.net/2007/11/16/googles-still-playing-with-the-pagerank/#comment-15648</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuffbysarah.net/2007/11/16/googles-still-playing-with-the-pagerank/#comment-15648</guid>
		<description>Sorry to hear that Empress. I know we all say ignore it but it&#039;s still hard to when that green bar has disappeared.nnI can see sites that I know sell links are slowly losing PR, whereas others aren&#039;t. I&#039;m wondering whether promoting the likes of Text Link Ads is also causing people to get penalised. As I said, it just makes a mockery of the whole system. They should just stop showing PR on the toolbar because it clearly has no relevance these days (not that it had much before all of this hoohaa started).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to hear that Empress. I know we all say ignore it but it&#039;s still hard to when that green bar has disappeared.nnI can see sites that I know sell links are slowly losing PR, whereas others aren&#039;t. I&#039;m wondering whether promoting the likes of Text Link Ads is also causing people to get penalised. As I said, it just makes a mockery of the whole system. They should just stop showing PR on the toolbar because it clearly has no relevance these days (not that it had much before all of this hoohaa started).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Empress</title>
		<link>http://www.stuffbysarah.net/2007/11/16/googles-still-playing-with-the-pagerank/#comment-15647</link>
		<dc:creator>Empress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuffbysarah.net/2007/11/16/googles-still-playing-with-the-pagerank/#comment-15647</guid>
		<description>I noticed my pagerank zeroed out last night.  I&#039;m like, when will this end.  Does it matter?  Should I worry?  I&#039;m not even sure what to think anymore.nnSo I&#039;m off to read some of the posts linked to above :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed my pagerank zeroed out last night.  I&#039;m like, when will this end.  Does it matter?  Should I worry?  I&#039;m not even sure what to think anymore.nnSo I&#039;m off to read some of the posts linked to above <img src='http://www.stuffbysarah.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.stuffbysarah.net/2007/11/16/googles-still-playing-with-the-pagerank/#comment-15646</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuffbysarah.net/2007/11/16/googles-still-playing-with-the-pagerank/#comment-15646</guid>
		<description>Mark I completely agree. I personally don&#039;t use Google for search apart from when a client phones asking me to search on it. Still, from what I&#039;ve read, this zero ranking may be temporary, who knows!nnFor anyone that&#039;s interested Mark&#039;s post on Google is &lt;a href=&quot;http://bloggercamp.com/2007/11/16/page-rank/google-and-the-negative-impact-of-pagerank/&quot;&gt;Google and the Negative Impact of PageRank&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark I completely agree. I personally don&#039;t use Google for search apart from when a client phones asking me to search on it. Still, from what I&#039;ve read, this zero ranking may be temporary, who knows!nnFor anyone that&#039;s interested Mark&#039;s post on Google is <a href="http://bloggercamp.com/2007/11/16/page-rank/google-and-the-negative-impact-of-pagerank/" class="external">Google and the Negative Impact of PageRank</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Penix</title>
		<link>http://www.stuffbysarah.net/2007/11/16/googles-still-playing-with-the-pagerank/#comment-15645</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Penix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuffbysarah.net/2007/11/16/googles-still-playing-with-the-pagerank/#comment-15645</guid>
		<description>Exactly why I wrote my recent post. Ignore it and it&#039;ll go away - my mother always says.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly why I wrote my recent post. Ignore it and it&#039;ll go away &#8211; my mother always says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.stuffbysarah.net/2007/11/16/googles-still-playing-with-the-pagerank/#comment-15644</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuffbysarah.net/2007/11/16/googles-still-playing-with-the-pagerank/#comment-15644</guid>
		<description>Looks like this zeroing is happening to a few others as well - &lt;a href=&quot;http://andybeard.eu/2007/11/zerorank-more-pagerank-carnage-round-5.html&quot;&gt;Zerorank - more PageRank carnage&lt;/a&gt; from Andy Beard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like this zeroing is happening to a few others as well &#8211; <a href="http://andybeard.eu/2007/11/zerorank-more-pagerank-carnage-round-5.html" class="external">Zerorank &#8211; more PageRank carnage</a> from Andy Beard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
