Today I spoke to a long term client about some new updates on their site. I'd spoke to her briefly a couple of weeks ago where she mentioned that a local developer had been sniffing around trying to get their custom, pulling holes in the current website, despite being told they were not interested in hiring him.

Okay, so I appreciate that people looking for work will look through the local businesses and tout their work to them. If you're low on work you need to see what you can get. Luckily we've never been in that position, but I know if I was then I wouldn't approach it in the following manner.

First the developer visited the shop, asked if they needed a new developer and pointed out a few design/content issues that needed addressing (some of which are already being addressed anyway). My contact was away at the time but the owner was there and he entertained the guy a little. Maybe that was the wrong thing to do. The developer clearly took that as the green light and turned up again when my contact was there. She told him that they were not interested, they already had a development company on board and he wouldn't be hired. He didn't really take the hint however, then asking who did the site, who hosted it, what platform it was running on (it's not hard to find this information out but still…). She asked him politely to leave, eventually he did.

A week later he was back (persistant, or desperate, that's for sure!) and just sat down waiting for the owner who was in a meeting. My contact again told him to leave, in which he replied that as they didn't seem that bothered in his content points he'd gone and phoned the press office of their supplier, pointing out that the supplier's name wasn't mentioned on the front page of the site, and that the catalogue on the site was out of date (although that's the supplier's fault for not getting the current one sent out until last week!). Strangely enough, that didn't go down too well!

I can appreciate in these times that people are maybe low on work, but honestly, if you're going to try and get new clients, or steal clients from another developer, then do it a bit more ethically and don't treat your prospective new client badly or try to go above them! You really won't make any friends and potentially damage your own reputation.

On a lighter note, shortly after a regular customer of theirs asked for their site developer's details as they loved the site and really liked the functionality and design of it

There's this new hosting around called Cloud Hosting (well it's new to me!). It's a different type of hosting than normal server hosting in that the site files are on a server cluster, so you don't get slowed down by a maxed out processor or someone else's poorly coded site (something we've probably all experienced on a shared host!).

Another nice point is the ability to run Windows and Linux scripts side by side, which is something I needed back in January for a site that needed Windows to auto update the database nightly into MSSQL (a supplied program from the database provider) but PHP to allow me to write the code, as I've long since forgotten ASP!

Finally, the additional bandwidth costs on this type of hosting are a lot less than standard hosting, around 50% of the cost. A friend who runs a popular entertainment site recently had a shock when a trailer they were hosting became a bit of an internet sensation sending visitor numbers soaring. The only problem is their 24 hours in the spotlight racked up bandwidth bills of almost £700 on their shared hosting account, and that bill was reduced by the hosting company in good faith. If they'd been on cloud hosting then that bill would have been around just half that.

As I mentioned Cloud Hosting is quite new to me, however a good friend of mine has started selling it through his hosting company who I recommend for all types of hosting. The packages are sold on a monthly contract and you get an inclusive bandwidth and space in that price, then any extra you need is charged for at the end of the month, a bit like our pay monthly mobile phone contracts.

So if you've got a site that can go up and down in bandwidth, or have large bandwidth bills, or you need to be able to run PHP and ASP together, then take a look at Cloud Hosting.

For a month where I thought life would start to slow down a little thanks to virtually completing the two major projects that had been hanging over my head for months before, this month has instead just flown by!

I mentioned last time that David and I had merged our businesses to form a company, which starts trading on 1st April. So we've been making a few preparations for that, getting the client list in check, getting the clients added to our online accounts system – Kashflow (read my review), and also sorting out the new company site, bank account, insurance etc.

We were also planning on using WHMCS to manage all of our hosting and domain clients, along with those on support contracts, however the main reason was for the automated billing, which I then discovered Kashflow could handle, so why duplicate the work and the cost!

In our personal lives things have taken a major turn in that we got engaged a couple of weeks ago and hope to get married towards the end of the year This is obviously a bit of a distraction, and also means we need to work even harder to save up for all the costs involved!

So yes, it's even more all go here than normal!

I mentioned a month ago or so that a lot was happening right now, the first step being our new dedicated server (which is ace and so quick!). The next, and more major step, is that on Monday David and I formed a Limited Company and will start trading under this from 1st April.

I've been a soletrader for almost 8 years now, and have thought/intended to go limited earlier however a lack of time and organisation just meant I never really got around to it. However, last year we were thinking about forming a partnership (and never got around to it!), so this year we're getting everything sorted, the new server, a new company and it'll be VAT registered too (VAT registration is not a requirement of a UK company under a certain turnover, but we've gone for it anyway), automated billing software for the client hosting and domains, and more.

There's so much to sort out now! New bank account, business cards (courtesey of Moo Cards), letters to write, client details to input, plus to still work full time!

March is going to be a busy month of sorting things out, but it'll be worth it

I've recently been finishing off a site where I needed a lightbox to simplify showing several photos for each product. I've used Thickbox in the past, as it comes with WordPress by default, however this is a custom built site. I already had the latest version of jQuery running for other functions on the site, so just needed to grab a copy of thickbox, upload that, add the necessary code and that should be that.

3 hours of going around in circles later… and still no joy! After checking over my code piece by piece, trying the code out of WordPress, trying the page on another server just in case, and trying every other option I could think of, I finally tried uploading jQuery 1.2.6 from my WordPress 2.7 folder on my computer, and hey presto, it all worked!

It seems that there is a minor change required for thickbox to work with the latest jQuery version. After a bit of searching around I found out that what's needed is on line 79 of the existing thickbox file you need to change the line

Existing Thickbox Code

1. TB_TempArray = $("a[@rel="+imageGroup+"]").get();

to not include the @ sign in it ie.

New Thickbox Code

1. TB_TempArray = $("a[rel="+imageGroup+"]").get();

Such a simple change that caused a few hours of frustration! So hopefully it may be of use to someone else